Talk:Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Legacypac in topic not really
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2018. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
[no title]
editAppreciate that you can review this page, thanks.
Notable company per WP:LISTED. Some of the refs that were manually numbered seem to be lost and shoild be restored. Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
I know this is not copyvio - I checked that. I also recall the refs were there before but with manually inserted numbers. I rewrote some portions to fix english and reduce repetition. Legacypac (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
not really
editTo editor Legacypac: I make a case that the subject isn't notable. Please clean up the citation artifacts in the meantime. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Well as a public company listed on the Hong Kong Exchange, they are notable per WP:LISTED and they are a major subsiderary of a large notable private conglomerate Chow Tai Fook. There is a fanatic idea that no company is notable and any mention is advertising, but say a person who appears at an Olympics but is never heard from again is auto notable. This needs to change. Public companies, in this case a multinational with around 90 years of history, impact thousands of investors, employees, suppliers, and pension fund beneficieries. This is real life important not some silly pokemon charactor. Legacypac (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- You take a different reading from LISTED, because it does not presume notability for companies.
"There is a fanatic idea that no company is notable and any mention is advertising, but say a person who appears at an Olympics but is never heard from again is auto notable."
This is a WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument. I agree, Wikipedia is really inclusive towards athletes. When NATHLETE is rewritten I will gladly join in the purge. Meanwhile, I stick to what the community has decided. Also, you'll note that I don't edit fanboy stuff like Pokemon. If these weak arguments are the best you have, you ought to rethink editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)- I would suggest rereading WP:LISTED and considering that WP:N is supposed to be the standard across the site. Therefore if an athlete qualifies for a page under N then absolutely a listed company with far more available info qualifies. Legacypac (talk) 13:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- You take a different reading from LISTED, because it does not presume notability for companies.
Merge/redirect?
editThis could be merged with Chow Tai Fook whose main content is about the jewellery group already. Theroadislong (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)