Talk:Chionoecetes opilio

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Rosieredfield in topic Thanks!

Photographs

edit

There is only one photograph and it is poor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.106.90 (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chionoecetes opilio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Motility - Can they propel themselves in water?

edit

Some crab can swim (they have specially adapted rear legs that act as paddles). I suspect that opilio crab can not swim well, but that they may swim (propel themselves in water) to some extent? If so, how does this vary between juveniles, females, and males? Can anyone add this information to the article? FreeFlow99 (talk) 12:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

edit

Just a note to say that this is very well written, with technical terms introduced with clear explanations. Thanks for al your work. Rosieredfield (talk) 01:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply