Talk:China Central Television/Archive 2

October 2014

edit

Despite the website using the word "live" I can only find recorded videos in comparison to the Russian website RTTV. I remember a live feed that was on line last year.1archie99 (talk) 11:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Domain rename

edit

The primary cite seems to have moved from a subsite of cctv.cntv.cn to cctv.com, should we update the official links to reflect this? If you check them all they forward from CN to COM. Ranze (talk) 07:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on China Central Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

2018 is still in the future

edit

A {{dubious}} template was added by another user, with this section name as the parameter.

The problem is that the past tense in the sentence is inconsistent with the date given. I suspect that this is either a typo or a poor-quality translation from Chinese. Can anyone clarify what the original author could have meant? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on China Central Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:China Network Television which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


Attention. CCTV will merge with China National Radio and China Radio International.

edit

Source: http://news.sina.com.cn/c/nd/2018-03-21/doc-ifysnhat1097446.shtml

the new institution will be called “中央广播电视总台”, and internationally as “中国之声”(traslation is yet to be announced, but it's highly likely just Voice of China (not to be confused with The Voice of China. Disambiguation will be needed).

This is of course a move to counter VOA.

article mergers should not happen until the merger is finished before late 2018, but the news should be reflected in all three articles.

There are also 60 changes to PRC's important institusions in the above source, so be prepared for a bizzarely high amount of moves and mergers before March 2019.Ywwuyi, GCCPK (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 19 October 2021

edit

Remove biased reference: "CCP Propaganda Department." The name is "Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China." https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Publicity_Department_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party

Remove biased editorial content stated as fact: "Since its inception CCTV has served as a tool of state power and as such has been complicit in human rights abuses. They have a history of demonizing and inciting hatred against those perceived as foes by the CCP, in this way they can be used to mobilize against threats as diverse as Falun Gong and international Human Rights Groups" Such a value judgement violates NPOV. A contributor is not allowed to launder their own biases through a source that spouts the same: two matching subjective opinions does not equal objectivity, regardless that the lack of criticality of the contributor makes them believe such is the case. 2601:18B:8200:3AE:EC06:9F53:F3B1:9D90 (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply