Talk:Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut → Chesterfield Inlet — Currently Chesterfield Inlet is about the inlet. However the common usage is for the community. Chesterfield Inlet should move to Chesterfield Inlet (Nunavut) and the community to Chesterfield Inlet. Relisted. Jafeluv (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC) Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 01:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose the current proposal because Chesterfield Inlet (Nunavut) does not disambiguate the inlet from the town (both are in Nunavut). Evidence of the town being the primary usage would be nice too. — AjaxSmack 16:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- About the only thing is a Google search. And of course that is not definitive. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 01:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose the other article can move to Chesterfield Inlet (Nunavut) (standard naming form for non-official settlements and geographic features), but if that is done, a disambiguation page should sit at the primary. "Inlet" is obviously a water feature. 76.66.199.238 (talk) 04:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree that the current names are not good; Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut is still ambiguous, but so is Chesterfield Inlet (Nunavut). Possibly a two-way DAB is part of the solution, as primary usage will be hard to establish either way, but the main question is to provide a meaningful disambiguator for the article or articles that continue to require one. Andrewa (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.