Talk:Charales

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic Split needed

Citation needed

edit

"Cytoplasmic streaming is caused by the microfilaments found inside the cell, as proven by the use of cytochalasin B to stop streaming."

Requires, in my opinion, a citation.

Maybe one of these

https://www-sciencedirect-com.virtual.anu.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0014482777800293

https://jcs-biologists-org.virtual.anu.edu.au/content/17/3/655 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.68.87 (talk) 04:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Questions

edit

Does the encrusting of of the algae by CaCO3 have any (potential) economic value? Are any other minerals (eg Mg,Sr,Zn,Mn,Fe++) ever sequestered along with the Ca? Does the lime provide protection? Does "acid rain" dissolve the lime? Are there organo-Ca chemicals or polymers created? The picture shows a verdant place; do these algae also grow in high osmotic or electrolyte areas such as alkali ponds? What controls the elaborated structure of the lime aggregates, and what variants are known, in vivo and in vitro? Are they edible? Just curious.... regford 18:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply


The family Characeae (order Charales) has 6 modern genera but not 4!!! Dmitry Kapustin 19:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have found (in the books):- Chara, Lamprothamnium, Nitella, Nitellosis, Tolypella. There may be another genus somewhere! I'll have to have another look. Any ideas?Osborne 16:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

And the sixth one is Lychnothamnus. Look: Krause W. Charales(Charophyceae) //Süβwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 18, 1997. Dmitry Kapustin 15:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Split needed

edit

The article is confused/confusing, because it assumes that the Charales and Characeae have the same circumscription. In many treatments, it is the case that the Characeae are the only family in the Charales that has living (extant) species, although as of February 2022, AlgaeBase puts Nitellopsis in the family Feistiellaceae. All sources I've looked at that include fossils agree that Charales includes multiple fossil families. So there should be two articles: a brief one on the order Charales, and a longer one on the family Characeae, I think in the broad sense in which it includes Nitellopsis. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply