Talk:Chandra X-ray Observatory

Untitled

Mission Length:? Why is the mission Length so Short? It is my understanding that the telescope is still operating. Did the initial 4 days have a cooled detector for calibration that is no longer present? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.55.4.36 (talk) 17:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

• That length refers to the shuttle mission that launched the telescope. --Etacar11 03:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Technical Aspect - resolution

The article says Chandra has a resolution 1000 times better than the earliest x-ray telescope. However, according to NASA at [1], it has a resolution 8 times better. This might need to be changed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.161.155.70 (talk • contribs) 01:59, March 10, 2007 (UTC)

The NASA ref says "It has eight-times greater resolution and is able to detect sources more than 20-times fainter than any previous X-ray telescope." rather than the earliest so there's no conflict. Just need to add which was the earliest and which was the best prior to 1999. - Rod57 (talk) 14:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

May 14th 2008 Announcement - discovery

Anyone have anything more specific on this story? Or do we all just have to wait a week... Hiberniantears (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

"the discovery of an object in our Galaxy astronomers have been hunting for more than 50 years" ?? - Rod57 (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Since this is very much not a recent mission any longer...

Do we need the recent mission tag?sinneed (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

detector damage

werent' the detectors damaged during spacecraft checkout?--Patbahn (talk) 15:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed automatic updating of orbital elements

I've proposed that this article be included in a trial involving using a bot to update orbital elements automatically on a fortnightly basis. I've started a discussion at WikiProject Spaceflight regarding this article and nine others, and would welcome some input from the users involved in maintaining the pages in question. --W. D. Graham 20:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Angular What?

> Chandra is sensitive to X-ray sources 100 times fainter than any previous X-ray telescope, enabled by the high angular resolution of its mirrors.

Sounds intersting. What means the "angular resolution of mirrors?" I wouldn't mind a little technical talk. 75.110.100.120 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

It means how small an angular size an object can have and be resolved by the telescope's optics. Here's a quickie about angular size: From Earth, the Moon has a certain angular size, about 1/2 of one degree. The planet Jupiter, from Earth, has a much smaller angular size. In terms of kilometers (or miles, or whatever), Jupiter has a diameter very much larger than does the Moon. If they were side-by-side at the same distance, Jupiter would look enormously bigger than the Moon. But since the Moon is much closer than Jupiter it can have a larger angular size.

The angular resolution of a telescope has to do with whether it can resolve Jupiter as a recognizable disc or just a fuzzy blur. The larger the diameter of the telescope's objective mirror, and the more precisely its surface is shaped like a paraboloid, the better its angular resolution. Put another way, it's like whether or not you can read the words on a billboard from some distance.

Originally designed for in-orbit repair/servicing

[2] says "designed for serving at 5 year intervals" - Rod57 (talk) 22:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

What images possible ?

Can we say how many pixels across the CCD sensor and the microchannel plate are ? And how is the high time-resolution of the microchannel plate useful ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Could add

• How fast and often does it reorient to new targets ?
• What proportion of time spent using the 2 sensors and and either spectrometer ?
• What components have failed or degraded ?
• How fast is the on-board propellant being used ?
  • How much for orbital maintenance, and how much to unwind the reaction wheels ?

- Rod57 (talk) 14:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chandra X-ray Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130510130847/http://quest.nasa.gov/dso/news/press_release/12-11-00.txt to http://quest.nasa.gov/dso/news/press_release/12-11-00.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Nasa program

Hi,
I'm looking for the program with Chandra to observe the mutation of A2261-BCG. 'want to do a translation for wp:fr. Don't remember the name of this article. Thanks and Best regards, Mike Coppolano (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

A thank you

Thank you to all of you have worked diligently on this entry. I am just a user of Wikipedia, nothing more. Virtually every day I find myself reading articles just because I like to learn and know things. There are things in this entry that I have explore to get a sense of what the full article is telling me. Thank you to all of you who take time to allow so may others to enjoy Wikipedia. Rocklobster7413 (talk) 12:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)