Talk:Cesc Fàbregas/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Please ensure that all future developments to this article are properly sourced and formatted. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

I gave the article a minor copyedit, but the prose could use a further polish. It is however not bad at all and certainly GA standard.--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  • So how was anyone supposed to know that a re-assessment was going to take place? This seemed out of the blue. Chensiyuan (talk) 03:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Okay this has actually been clarified so no longer a live issue... Chensiyuan (talk) 06:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)