Talk:Cerebras

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 May 2021 by reviewer Greenman (talk · contribs).

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Verify grandiose/marketing claims

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

First, briefly, this is my first time attempting to contribute so I apologize if I'm doing this wrong.

Several of the claims in this article are overblown and sound as if they're taken from the company's own marketing. One that particularly stands out, "delivering up to 1 exaFLOPS of AI computing power, or at least one quintillion (1018) operations per second", just barely avoids being a bold-faced lie. That would put it on par with the world record-holding Frontier supercomputer, while using 1/40th the power, and by necessity at a fraction of the cost. This dubious claim seems contingent on the term "AI computing power", which to my knowledge is not a agreed upon metric for measuring computing power (unlike, say, FLOPS). It appears to just be a marketing buzzword, and even their own website reluctantly admits it has about 1/8th as much actual compute.

This, and other claims in the article, may want to be double checked. Buggy1997123 (talk) 07:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, yes the article does need close review, and there appears to be a COI (which I've tagged on the article) as well. Greenman (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic