Talk:Cemetery of the Defenders of Lwów
![]() | A fact from Cemetery of the Defenders of Lwów appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Irpen's edits
edit- While I generally agree with Irpen's latest edit summary, in which he suggests to keep events of marginal importance in separate articles, there is a tiny but. I don't agree with his interpretation of what is important and what is not. To me the two facts he removed seem of crucial importance: the fact that the Poles won the war and repelled the Ukrainian aggression allowed that cemetery to be constructed at all. Without the victory there would be no cemetery. The other fact Irpen removed (Polish support) seems crucial as well, since this indeed was when the situation changed. //Halibutt 09:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'd also note that this 'irrelevant' fact is noted by both Polish and Ukrainian references, which for some reason apparently don't consider it irrelevant: Warsaw Voice: The recent change of the political situation in Ukraine and Poland’s support for the Orange Revolution made Ukrainian politicians treat many controversial issues, including the Eaglets’ Cemetery, more favorably.; National Radio Company of Ukraine The deputies set June 24 as the date to inaugurate the cemetery, taking into account the need to conclusively reconciliate Ukrainian and Polish war veterans and Poland's support for the orange revolution in Ukraine. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 14:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
File:Orleta1939.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
edit
An image used in this article, File:Orleta1939.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
B-class review
editI've added a missing ref, and I think this article passes B-class criteria. As a major contributor, I'll ask for another review (from the MILHIST project), and till then, the WP:POLAND assessment will match MILHIST. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cemetery of the Defenders of Lwów. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928014907/http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/index.php?id=148&listid=15458 to http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/index.php?id=148&listid=15458
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)