Talk:Cauchy's theorem (geometry)

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Polyhedra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Question: I'm not a math person, but wiki-ing "Cauchy's theorem" brings up 3-4 other rules he made, or were named after him. Is this one of those, and should be merged or re-directed? Or is it another one, which should be added to th disambig page? Cantras 19:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's a different one. I will add it to disambig page later today. Mhym 19:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ref removed

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are about a dozen different small generalizations of the Cauchy theorem mentioned in the Connelly's article. They are nice, but not impressive, which is why I didn't include them. Including "orthogonal polyhedra" feels like recentism and undue weight. Please explain here why this is say more impressive than non-convex polyhedra where 4-saddle points are allowed. Mhym (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic