Talk:Caterina Sforza

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tkmndd in topic Alchemy

Birthday?

edit

On what exact day was Caterina born? jeanne (talk) 07:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Grammar needs to be improved

edit

I've done some work on the article but the sentence structure and grammar still needs much work to bring the article up to Wikipedia standards.--jeanne (talk) 08:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Still very true six years later!- Xenxax (talk) 23:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Descent from Caterina to William

edit

Princess Diana was many times descended from Charles II, not only through the son by his mistress, Louise de Kerouaille, but also through the Duke of Grafton, Charles' illegitimate child by Barbara Villiers, Lady Castlemaine. Diana was also a descendant of King James II, therefore, Primce William is descended many times over from Caterina Sforza.--jeanne (talk) 07:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Editing: Grammar and run-ons

edit

I edited a number of run-ons and grammatical errors, as well as some errors of punctuation. As usual, I used Wiki and MFaS guidelines for all edits.

There is still a great deal of work to be done, however.

Fairygothmommy (talk) 00:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Eccentricities

edit

Why is "'experiments'" placed in quotes in reference to Sforza's alchemical work? If the notion is that alchemy is discredited today, that still does not mean an experiment is not an experiment. Also, why is there a personal dedication on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.229.114 (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think the personal dedication should be deleted.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
The quotes have been removed as well as the personal dedication on this page.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
There is a second use of quotes that I have removed. If someone sees a reason for the quotes, use an adjective or better description instead. Smoore 500 (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Three Graces

edit

Caterina cannot possibly be the figure on the right. It looks nothing like any other portrait said to be Caterina. On the other hand, it has the strong profile and very protruding forehead of several pain tings that are said to be Simonetta Vespucci. It cannot b both. If Caterina had red hair, then that isn't her. Amandajm (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caterina Sforza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NINAN01, Dr Alec Holland, Sav13584 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Patt0400 (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Too much detail in intro section

edit

Theory of "masculine role" seems opinionated. The stuff about medals is marginal for the article as a whole, let alone where it is positioned.

02:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Michaelmross (talk) 02:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: History of Science

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tkmndd, Kmd43p (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Can7f5, Miguel Nunez 1119.

— Assignment last updated by K8shep (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Alchemy

edit

Kmd43p and I are adding a section on alchemy under the legacy section. Tkmndd (talk) 16:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply