Talk:Catch-22 (miniseries)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Captainllama in topic Blatant plagiarism

Blatant plagiarism

edit

The entire “Premise” section is lifted verbatim from the article at https://deadline.com/2018/12/catch-22-george-clooneys-hulu-limited-series-first-photos-1202523127/, referenced in footnote 29.

Dodiad (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Per the above I have tagged for revdel. The violating content dates to the article creation, pinging user:BoogerD. Captainllama (talk) 17:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
BoogerD is no longer active and hasn't edited since February. However, this really isn't a case of plagiarism; the text wasn't added with the intention of passing it as original text; the text was added with quotes and was cited properly. This is allowed per WP:COPYQUOTE. Could the text be rewriten in someone's own words to avoid an overly-long quotation? Sure. But I don't think the plagiarism accusations and all this is really necessary. Drovethrughosts (talk) 18:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. (BoogerD has a ten-year gap in his editing, while we're exchanging BoogerD observations). I cited for WP:COPYVIO, not plagiarism, and made no "accusations". I realise it was cited and in quotes. WP:COPYQUOTE does say "The copied material should not comprise a substantial portion of the work being quoted…" The material here is (but for intro and outro and cast) a straight copy of the entirety of the original. But that's ok? Well... ok then. I'm no expert in this area and I jumped on it because of the serious nature of possible legal jeopardy, and for the same reason I'd have felt a little happier if an admin had been allowed to pick it up per tag. Cheers! Captainllama (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://deadline.com/2018/12/catch-22-george-clooneys-hulu-limited-series-first-photos-1202523127/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Captainllama (talk) 17:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply