Talk:Casualties of the Israel–Hamas war
![]() | Controversy regarding the number of Palestinian casualties in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Casualties of the Israel–Hamas war. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Casualties of the Israel–Hamas war article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 20 days ![]() |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Use of media reports in death toll
editThis section is problematic:
As of 29 February, the Gaza Health Ministry stated that its daily tallies now rely upon "a combination of accurate death counts from hospitals that are still partially operating, and on estimates from media reports to assess deaths in the north of Gaza", but did not "cite or say which sources those are." On 31 March, it stated that 15,070 fatalities (45.8% of the then total) had been compiled via "reliable media sources" instead of direct reporting.
The quotation is not from the Gaza health ministry, but from an NPR article summarising their statements. The summary is incorrect - the health ministry never said it uses media reports. The ministry attributed a portion of the deaths to "المصادر الإعلامية الموثوقة". This has been translated as "reliable media sources" but in context can also mean the hospital's press team. This is in fact what the ministry has said - that these numbers are the result of body counts performed by the hospital's press officers. They have said very clearly that they do not do media monitoring.
https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-conflict-thousands-remain-unidentified-as-death-toll-reaches-40-000-13197287 Curevesi (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. I'll add it to the Gaza Health Ministry article under methodology, it expands on what's there. There are a number of points which I think are unclear but it at least makes the area of uncertainty smaller. I think your interpretation has a problem in that the hospitas wouldn't have press teams able to do what you say. And they say they do not depend on any press sources. There are however first responders and ambulances that could be instructed to do as described in the article. Whether they also have another source is unclear to me from what is said. Perhaps it's deliberate - rather too many journalists have been killed to be complacent about who they are or what they do.. NadVolum (talk) 20:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 August 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To even state that all civilian men could be considered as combatants is highly misleading and deeply offensive. APaul2021 (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bunnypranav (talk) 05:47, 1 September 2024 (UTC)