Talk:Castro Theatre

Historic Landmark

I Specified "San Francisco City Historical Landmark" as the term "Historic Landmark" is insufficient as the Castro Theatre is not an actual "California Historical Landmark", But is the 100th San Francisco City Landmark.

Please see the list of California Registered Historic Landmarks at: [1]

And San Francisco City Historical Landmarks: [2]

Editor^U.S.A. (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Castro Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120215050310/http://sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/planning/preservation/PresBulletin09LANDMARKS.PDF to http://sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/planning/preservation/PresBulletin09LANDMARKS.PDF
• Added archive https://archive.is/20100523105717/http://www.film-noir-alley.com/castro-theater.html to http://www.film-noir-alley.com/castro-theater.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Mighty Wurlitzer is no more

The Castro's famous Mighty Wurlitzer was removed a few years ago. A temporary organ was installed in its place until a new digital symphonic organ can be built and installed. Does anyone know: 1) the name of the family who owned and maintained the Mighty Wurlitzer [the Castro never officially owned the organ--it was leased from a family whose name I can't remember]; 2) the name (manufacturer) of the temporary organ; 3) ~when the digital organ will be installed? I only see the "coming soon" announcements about the new organ from the pre-show slide show projected on the screen (so I feel a bit like Grampa Simpson, who claims most of what he knows about history is pieced together from restaurant sugar packets). Thanks! Kinkyturnip (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I decided to add some information about the instrument, considering that a letter to the Project Manager for the theatre stated that the goals for the remaining fundraiser had been met, and installation of the organ will begin once the renovation of the theatre allows for it. YouFoundSharpe2 (talk) 00:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Information on the new organ

I decided to put information on the new organ being installed at the theatre into the article, yet I still think the information should be split into a new article, as the specifications are so large that I do not want to increase the readable prose size for the article as a whole. Specifications: [3] YouFoundSharpe2 (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't see the need for a split, as the current length is quite short. Nothing from the technical document you have linked to seems appropriate for an encyclopedia article (though I would have no objection to linking to it). The current text already delves quite deeply into primary sources (the FAQ), rather than summarizing coverage in reliable secondary sources.--Trystan (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)