Talk:Casebook: Jack the Ripper

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability

edit

Jus in case it ever comes up, I am certain this article exceeds standards for WP:WEB inclusion, based upon multiple references in books, magazines, newspaper articles and documentaries. If anyone ever needs it, I can track down specific cites. Be aware, however, that I am only on Wikipedia sporadically so if you leave a post here or my talk page I may not see it for a long time.

I'm not sure how to check traffic stats, but I'd bet it rates from that alone as well. If it becomes an issue, the person questioning it can go find out ho Wikipedia checks these things and then go do it. 172.130.239.49 19:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Guess I wasn't signed in, so the talk page for this account won't ever be checked anyway. Sorry about that. 172.130.239.49 19:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
"Jus in case … specific cites. … find out ho … ." These were proably just typos, but I can't help but read them as puns to the misspellings in the Ripper letters :-) 97.124.86.85 (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Casebook: Jack the Ripper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply