Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Willbb234 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Comment: I have already read and copyedited this article. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Copyedited roughly ten days ago. All good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Plenty of WP:RS to back up information.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Covers the topic well and explains the key areas in detail
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Written neutrally
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    A single, non-free image but with fair use rationales. Used appropriately
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Very well written article. More images would have been good, but due to the subject of the article, good images are hard to come by.