Talk:Care in the Community

Untitled

hey can someone add one of those neutrality taggy dealies? Some of this is pretty suspect.

Text removed

I removed the text added by User:80.41.251.124 on March 28, 2006. Similar to what is found in WP:SPCP, there exists a reasonable suspicion that the text was copied from elsewhere:

1. There was a very large amount of non-wikified text contributed all at once by an anonymous editor,
2. There existed a lack of minor edits by that editor following the contribution,
3. The writing style seemed too good to be true, and
4. There existed give-away phrases that appear out of place (e.g. "further reading" and "These sources provide additional information on Community Care.)".

I cannot prevent anyone from reverting these changes, but I would ask that they cite the sources for the addition per WP:V. -AED 00:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutrality

I feel this page should be marked for neutrality issues. There is quite a bit of suspect language here.

Flymojo 04:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Overview required

Somebody needs to write an overview. I have no idea of what this is about so can't write it myself, but I don't have the time to read the whole article.

Scope of Griffiths Report

Was the Griffiths report and its recommendations meant to apply to the whole of the UK or just parts of it? There is a lot of talk about 'Health Board'. Scotland is the only part of the United Kingdom to have such institutions.

Things like this take away from the apparent authoritiveness of what is being said. It would be nice to have a few page or section references to the report.

--Publunch (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Merge suggestion

Please join the discussion in Talk:Community mental health service#Merge suggestion. `'Míkka>t 18:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

too much UK focus. rather than merging with community mental health, maybe noting this local focus Earlypsychosis (talk) 07:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Citations needed?

In the first paragraph of the Origins of Care in Community section, the last two sentences are tagged as needing citations. The rest of the section goes on to give textual examples of both these points, with full citations. Those original "Citation Needed" tags seem a bit unnecessary to me and clutter up the passage some.

90.197.208.0 (talk) 18:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

lead section

The lead sections seems to talk a tad much about what came before community care. whilst obviously important for context, some more information on community care itself would be important Farleigheditor (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)