Talk:Capel Manor House

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because nothing has been directly copied or pasted from another source. (your reason here) --Gyles82 (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I agree, this is not a copyright violation - I have removed the CSD tag. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 22:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Capel Manor House, Kent.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Capel Manor House, Kent.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Capel Manor House, Kent.jpeg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violation ?

In 2012 the article was flagged for deletion for copyright violation. It survived that challenge but I see the principal author has now been permanently banned for repeated copyright violation. The article certainly reads like a "lift" - it's highly POV and very largely uncited. I strongly suspect it merits a very vigorous pruning, but I'd be interested in others' thoughts. Thanks and regards. KJP1 (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)