Talk:Canton (heraldry)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

??

edit

How about someone explains all the weird un-linked terminology? Malick78 07:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, this has to be one of the least coherent articles I've ever seen. It's like a bad translation into English from another language. - Shaheenjim (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

dexter

edit

Isn't upper dexter, the upper right? In which case is the image currently a mirror image of what it should be? Aamackie (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The directions are reckoned from the holder of the shield's perspective, not the viewer's. --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 23:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

a cut

edit
The highly unusual usage of a "canton bendwise sinister" appears on the emblem of the 410 Flight Test Squadron of the United States Air Force.[1]

This is used in a labored attempt to blazon a field consisting of a tilted US flag. I'm taking it out: the reader does not need a catalog of every quasi-heraldic freak. (Cf WP:WEIGHT). —Tamfang (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Stars and Stripes

edit

Shouldn't the US Flag be an example of a flag with a canton. It's identified as such (in passing) on the Flag of the United States wikipage —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.15.215 (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

There probably are other omissions, too. Go ahead and add them if you like. —Tamfang (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

finality

edit
Flag of Tuvalu is the final flag with the Union Flag in its canton

This could mean "the permanent flag of Tuvalu (successor to one or more temporary flags) has a Union canton" or "this is the last flag that will ever have the Union canton", but I suspect that final here merely means newest. Can someone clarify? —Tamfang (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canton (heraldry). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply