Talk:Canada–Netherlands relations

Image copyright problem with File:Coat of arms of Canada.svg

The image File:Coat of arms of Canada.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Canada–Netherlands relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111102142721/http://www.globalbackpackers.com:80/workingholidayvisa.aspx to http://www.globalbackpackers.com/workingholidayvisa.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Canada–Netherlands relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080603050104/http://www.2ontario.com:80/welcome/coca_401.asp to http://www.2ontario.com/welcome/coca_401.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101011053207/http://www.ind.nl:80/en/Images/4012_tcm6-595.pdf to http://www.ind.nl/en/Images/4012_tcm6-595.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canada–Netherlands relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611181808/http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/14w-14e/nr-sp/index-eng.asp?id=8742 to http://www.airforce.forces.gc.ca/14w-14e/nr-sp/index-eng.asp?id=8742

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

World Cup vote

Since the random IP is insisting on it, despite a reasonable explanation in the edit comment, here's all the reasons why I removed the section on the World Cup 2026 vote.

1. It's terribly written with incorrect use of capital letters, simple mistakes in grammar and spelling, terrible syntax, and lacking basic wikilinking.
2. It's factually incorrect; the World Cup bid wasn't from Canada. It was a combined bid from Canada, the US, and Mexico.
3. It says the KNVB voted for Morocco for political reasons. This is also incorrect, it voted for Morocco for cultural reasons; there's a large Moroccan minority in the Netherlands and many of the national team's players have Moroccan backgrounds.
4. Most of the page focuses on political and historical ties. The vote is neither; the KNVB is a private organization and politics were not involved. The vote was not in any way indicative of the relationship between the two countries.

So I've removed it (again), and it should stay removed. DragonFury (talk) 18:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)