This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've reverted a series of changes made by IP editor 24.50.217.187. The Texas Military Forces Museum source cited in the article specifically says that Mabry is the third oldest active military installation in Texas; it's wildly implausible to suppose that that assertion could be true without the "active" qualification (the Mexicans, Spanish and indigenous Americans never had any military installations?). As for the other changes, if the IP editor has sources to support them, they can be reintroduced.-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I had understood the caption on the infobox image to mean that new defensive measures had been added to the entrance since 9/11, so that the picture showed the "post 9/11" form of the entrance; but, maybe it should be "pre-9/11" if they've indeed changed to a different entrance since then? I never saw it before 9/11. Can anyone confirm or deny that the entrance has been changed since 2001?-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
