Talk:Caetextia

WP:Reliability/WP:source =

All the links referencing to Caetextia are redirected to https://www.hgi.org.uk/human-givens/new-insights/caetextia Human givings institute, an institute This Wikipedia article seems to be [Ivan Tyrrell] and [Joe Griffin] who is noted as having created the orginization that is being referenced in this article.

There seems to be an alternative way of writing an article with the same base idea with a similair theory published Januari 2007: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249991105_Vermeulen_P_2007_Autisme_als_contextblindheid_Wetenschappelijk_Tijdschrift_Autisme_6_3_92-104 Which seems to be translated with: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=nl&user=ictXU8UAAAAJ&citation_for_view=ictXU8UAAAAJ:aqlVkmm33-oC

I'm not sure whether I'm capable or missing some... context somewhere.

--77.162.120.183 (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Editing

I am unable to edit this page. I am trying to improve the lede and do some reorganization but I get a database error everytime even if I only alter a letter or punctuation.

Proposed change (lede):

Caetextia (from the Latin word caecus, meaning "blind" and contextus, meaning "context") is a new concept proposed to describe a condition characterized by a blindness to perceptual context. It is an inability to keep track of different variables and to perceive deeper contexts that these variables are in. It can also refer to an individual who has equal right and left brain access.

The error message I get is: [6b8494d9-581b-47e8-a79e-4aa0aa84b9eb] Caught exception of type Wikimedia\Rdbms\DBQueryError. If you are interested to apply the edit and have no problem publishing the changes, feel free to do so. Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Article written from the perspective of people who aren't on the autism spectrum?

This article talks about the inability (a negative term) to "evaluate the significance of change". However, from the perspective of someone that has autism, this seems to be change of a type that is significant to people that don't have autism. In addition, it mentions giving situations that require attention to more than one interacting variable or factor at a time. However, it appears to be people who aren't autistic that, elsewhere, don't give attention to lots of interacting variables and factors that I notice: it seems the variables and factors noticed by the different neurotypes are simply different, people who aren't autistic noticing context, body language and subtlety in tone of voice and numerous variables there but people on the spectrum noticing numerous variables and factors in everything else, that is what people who aren't autistic appear not to notice, everything *except* those three things, including the amount of information that autistic people can process that it appears is the space used by people who aren't autistic to process information related to social interaction in the way people who aren't autistic do (as autistic people are perfectly capable of social interaction with other autistic people therefore according to a same standard between them but not interaction in a way that isn't autistic - I suspect what I've written will now confuse people who aren't autistic because it provides too much information for them and therefore this written material by me is itself an example of too many variables and factors for people who aren't autistic to deal with in many cases or may take them more time to get their head around than to many people on the spectrum who are capable of more easily understanding the complex ideas that I think in, with many variables, factors and nuance to them). aspaa (talk) 04:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

References