Talk:CAF Awards

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Football in Africa portal This article is supported by the African football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: WOSO Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the Women's football / soccer task force.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is CAF female player of the year the same as African Women Footballer of the Year? -Koppapa (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CAF Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927062711/http://www.liminaedizioni.it/griglia_libro.cfm?art_codice=102&codice_collana=1 to http://www.liminaedizioni.it/griglia_libro.cfm?art_codice=102&codice_collana=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Critics

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi @2001:1a40:1404:8600:8061:e477:e9a0:b43c,

You made a significant deletion of neutral information supported by international newspapers, with a comment labeling it as 'personal views,' which is not accurate. If you disagree with this statement, please provide an explanation for all your points.

Regards. Riad Salih (talk) 20:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @زكرياء نوير

You have to participate in the discussion rather than simply reverting sourced and neutral information from media sources such as RMC or Goal. If you believe the entire passage should be removed, please provide us with comprehensive reasons, following the guidelines set by Wikipedia. Meanwhile, it is advisable to refrain from making any reverts while an open dialogue is in progress

Regards Riad Salih (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic