Talk:Burial of Jesus

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 80.57.37.167 in topic Possible mistake in the reference 21
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Burial of Jesus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Date of composition of Luke's gospel

edit

This article gives the date of the composition of Luke's gospel as being around A.D. 90. I am sure that a book we used in Religious Education classes back in my school days gave the date of the composition of Luke's gospel as being around A.D. 80. Vorbee (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Possible mistake in the reference 21

edit

Reference 21 refers to:

Magness, Jodi (2011). Stone and Dung, Oil and Spit: Jewish Daily Life in the Time of Jesus. Eerdmans. p. 146.

And is cited for the following claim: "Martin Hengel argued that Jesus was buried in disgrace as an executed criminal who died a shameful death, a view widely accepted in scholarly literature"

It seems that this reference is not found on page 146, but rather on page 165. The book itself cites its' own source number 146, possibly the source of the mistake.

Moreover, the book then argues against this claim, on that same page:

 In my opinion, this view is based on a misunderstanding of archaeological evidence

80.57.37.167 (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.57.37.167 (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply