Talk:Bullshit Jobs

Latest comment: 12 days ago by LatakiaHill in topic UK "Books of the Year"

Untitled

edit

I find it unsatisfying that the entire "Reception" section is based on ONE review from an Establishment newspaper. This certainly gives undue weight to that reviewer's opinions. Qu1j0t3 (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to build it out. I probably won't get to it for a bit. czar 16:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I removed from "Reception" the sentence "A review in Philosophy Now found that Bullshit Jobs combines the worst elements of the industrial and the pre-industrial periods.[1]" because it isn't Bullshit Jobs that combines the worst elements of the industrial and the pre-industrial periods, and I can't find any similar opinion in the cited article, so I am not sure what was intended.CTourneur (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

French sources

edit

Dumping a bunch here while they're current, in case someone wants to review in the future.

czar 22:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Further reading

edit

Moving these sources to the talk page since apparently other editors find it displeasing.


Here are some sources that might be interesting to read but appear to cover ground already better covered by sources currently in the article:

czar 00:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

czar 01:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

German sources

edit

czar 11:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Academic sounding attack

edit

"A 2021 study empirically tested Graeber's claims, finding a low and declining proportion of employees who consider their jobs useless." The problem with a loaded articulation like this is the amount of time and effort it takes to refute it. There are a number of problems with this "study". However it may better to keep this line in the reception section since Graeber's work typically attracts inoperative detractions.

I expanded on what the study found and didn't find, which hopefully made the argument more nuanced that just a one-sentence attack. --LatakiaHill (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 18 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abergleitner, EA6666 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Mannybenzo (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Topics in Ethics Calling Bullshit

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marymountain, Thisrosegarden, Dylanfodor, Daniellebishop21 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Zachscillia, DylnC, MUreedyt.

— Assignment last updated by DylnC (talk) 23:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

UK "Books of the Year"

edit

I'm working on sourcing a claim in the Graeber biography coming from Penguin Books UK that Bullshit Jobs was "FT BUSINESS BOOK OF THE YEAR 2018, THE TIMES BOOK OF THE YEAR 2018, NEW STATESMAN BOOK OF THE YEAR 2018 and CITY AM BOOK OF THE YEAR 2018" and I'm saving my fact-checking here:

For now, I'm rating these claims, to the book's chagrin, as "bullshit". Please share additional sources here if you find them. czar 15:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the book appears in this "books of the year" The Times list, but I can't find anything for the others. LatakiaHill (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music F24

edit

  This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 9 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): YesGerald (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jay.ny3 (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Phil Now was invoked but never defined (see the help page).