Talk:Buffalo Bayou

NPOV Neutral Point of View

I agree there needs to some middle ground if information about this project is to be included on this page. One of the core tenets of editing for Wikipedia is writing with a neutral point of view. Everyone has opinions and this in not a place to post one sided opinions. If you want to discuss adding information about the project on the Buffalo Bayou page I suggest we discuss the points to be included and come to agreement about what should be added and the wording that should be used to give readers the information they need to arrive at an informed opinion. It may also be better to create a separate page about the project since it is only a small part of Buffalo Bayou which this page is intended to be about. Blogs or forums are a better place for turning public opinion toward your own. This site is meant to be unbiased. That is why I removed the section until more balanced information can be developed. I posted my suggestion that the information be removed for bias before to get some conversation going but none was made. So I deleted the information until some better material can be developed. --Bugonaharley (talk) 15:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Delete biased information about Memorial Park Demonstration Project

The section called "Controversy on Buffalo Bayou" should be removed due to its is biased nature. The information appears to be added by an activist group opposing the project. The content makes derogatory and inflammatory statements about individuals and contains false information in attempt to promote the groups independent views. -Bugonaharley — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugonaharley (talk • contribs) 14:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Shorten Sections

The "Restoration of the Bayou" section needs to be shortened. This might be accomplished by separating this section into "Restoration of the Bayou" and "Bayou Modernization". Some of the new community uses for it do not necessarily fall under "restoration" but rather "modernization". Other ideas and opinions are welcome. 64.128.27.82 (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buffalo Bayou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050403224551/http://www.hcfcd.org:80/L_buffalobayou.html to http://www.hcfcd.org/L_buffalobayou.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Buffalo River name found in old maps

I found some old maps which called this the Buffalo River: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v060/AE1997_Vol_60_0139.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v060/AE1997_Vol_60_0139.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

tidewater

Information I can find indicates that the Buffalo Bayou is tidal from the vicinity of downtown Houston downstream to its mouth. This is important information but is for whatever reason, not included in the main article. It should be added. Famartin (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)