Talk:Budapest Memorandum/Archive 1

Archive 1

Section titled "Critique"

The section titled "Critique" is indecipherable. It appears to have been written by someone who has limited English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C08C:A6F0:21C:B3FF:FEC3:2572 (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Ukrainian Canadians

What is the relevance of the statement that Ukrainian Canadians make up 3.3% of the population of Canada? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

No answer, so I shall eventually remove it.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Removed as redundant. Cheers for pointing it out, Richardson mcphillips. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Good job. Thanks. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 19:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Calidum ^{Talk To Me} 21:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

---

Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances → Budapest Memorandum – Because Budapest Memorandum do not provide any security assurances, so that name doesn't correspond to reality, it's just „filkina gramota”. See statement of U.S. ambassador in Ukraine. 46.63.38.5 (talk) 07:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - per sources [1]. The motivation for the proposal appears to be pure WP:POV motivated WP:OR.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

http://zn.ua/POLITICS/posol-ssha-budapeshtskiy-memorandum-ne-byl-dogovorom-o-garantiyah-bezopasnosti-146178_.html 46.63.38.5 (talk) 08:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I have no idea what that's supposed to show. Also, the actual name of the document actually has "Security Assurances" in it I believe.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

All that glitters is not gold. Let's call a spade a spade. 46.63.38.5 (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Then you should use the actual name, if you're going to call a Spade a Spade. Or are you going to rename all the movie articles to reflect the content of the movie instead of its title? Titles are Spades, and this is the Spade. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

The actual name of this document is politicized, so that's adversely affect the neutrality. Movies is not political or historical documents and neutrality issue for them isn't as relevant. 46.63.38.5 (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

The actual name of this document is the actual name of this document. The fact that you personally feel that this actual name is "politicized" is neither here nor there.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

• Comment please prove the WP:COMMONNAME is the suggested title. And that there are no other Budapest Memoranda out there, or if there is, that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the suggested name. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Current title is politized and not neutral because name of this document don't correspond with content. Budapest Memorandum is a redirect to Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, so I think there are no any other Budapest Memorandum. Also, in all language versions except Arabic, Korean, Chinese and English the title of this article is Budapest Memorandum. 46.63.38.5 (talk) 07:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

"except Arabic, Korean, Chinese and English " - I think you just basically proved that the article should stay where it is.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Explain your opinion, please. 46.63.38.5 (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

It's sort of self explanatory.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Are you language-nazi or something like that? 46.63.38.5 (talk) 07:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140309221523/http://www.taraskuzio.net/media13_files/30.pdf to http://www.taraskuzio.net/media13_files/30.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419030507/http://minsk.usembassy.gov/budapest_memorandum.html to http://minsk.usembassy.gov/budapest_memorandum.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring the lead

The RF position has been adequately summarised for the lead of the article already, Fascinum. Your additional content is WP:UNDUE for the lead, uses a WP:PRIMARY video source in Russian without any translation (and is from a personal account on YouTube), plus the grammar is left wanting. I am not going to copy edit additional content that is unwarranted in the first instance, and there's nothing you can say about it that will change my mind. Unless you can convince other editors that your content is due, I'm going to revert it. Please follow WP:BRD as I've requested of you a couple of times. All you're doing at the moment is trying to edit war in WP:POVPUSH content. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)