 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Alternate Meaning
editThe term is also used to describe a computer software Design Pattern.
2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
edit | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Efficiency?
editI wonder about the efficiency. When seeing bucket brigades in movies, covering open ground I can't imagine this being more efficient than a bunch of people running with buckets, both speed and capacity/calorie wise.
In narrow spaces this might be different.
Stationary?
editI wonder about the word "stationary" in the lead sentence. When you have a sufficient number of people involved that they can all remain stationary, that's a pretty classic image of a bucket brigade. But based on the sole reference and even the photo, the bucket brigade continues to work if the participants must cover some distance in order to transfer work items from their predecessor to their successor. In fact, some of the theoretical benefits of bucket brigades as self-organizing systems depend on this movement as a feature of their optimizing abilities. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- I changed it to "(relatively stationary)"... --Curious1i (talk) 02:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)