A fact from Brenda Sexton appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that despite having "little film-industry credibility", Brenda Sexton increased filmmaking-related spending in Illinois by 147 percent in her first year at the Illinois Film Office?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Right now this article reads more like a newspaper PR bio than an encyclopedia article. I would recommend that the text be gone through and think of what Encyclopedia Britanica would say and how they would say it. The 'Early life' section seems unencyclopedic and I earlier removed a statement about how much she earned per year. The parts on her role on the film board are good. I am not sure all of the places she worked in realty is encyclopedic either. Jbh (talk) 12:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I removed a bunch of places she worked in real estate. Personally I think the whole section should go because this history has nothing to do with her notability. Jbh (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your edits. For what remains in the 'real estate' section now, I believe that it should stay. It lists her noteworthy achievements in that particular field, and how Sexton has been able to succeed in her career. I can see how the earlier text was less "encyclopedia", but I don't think it is necessary to get rid of the section entirely. Mchuedem (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I removed a bit of 'puffery' "one of the top..". It is non-quantifiable, ie no award, what does "one of the top..." mean - top 10, top 100 etc. The rest seems OK to fill in what she was doing during that time in her life. Jbh (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've added to the lead to indicate why she is considered notable; I agree that the text has been improved. If talk is comfortable with it now, perhaps the banner tag can be removed? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I will not object if others wish to remove the tag. I still think the bio reads more like a book-cover bio but I guess that is more my idea of what "should" be rather than what is OK. Jbh (talk) 00:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
