Talk:Breaking the Fourth Wall (WandaVision)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Adamstom.97 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • "due to the fact that" → "because" (less wordy)
  • Remove the comma after "Nexus of All Realities connection".
  • "Cumberbatch was removed from the series entirely" – was there a reason?
  • "lifted up" – both words mean the same thing so consider removing "up".
  • Lola VFX is linked twice in #Visual_effects.
  • Entertainment Weekly is also linked twice in the article.
  • Is the tracklisting necessary? The only notable song is already mentioned in prose.
  • "resembles modern day" → "resembles the modern day"
  • "a 87% approval rating" → "an 87% approval rating"
  • Again, avoid having too many quotes and add more reviews (WP:RECEPTION).
  • "affects" – typo for "effects"?
  • "final two episode" → "final two episodes"
  • Remove the hyphen between "theme-song".
  • Remove the comma after "Bowen herself praised the episode".
  • Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
    • I have addressed all the small issues. I don't think there is as much need for expanding the reception section but I will take a look at it soon. We should definitely have the tracklisting, like the other episode articles the music section here is a doubling as an album section because there is no way we should have a separate article for this album. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
      • I agree regarding the track listing existing here because there is more music to the episode beside "Agatha All Along". We touch on a few points necessary for a reader here regarding Agatha All Along, while also discussing the other theme and info from Beck. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I don't think there is as much need for expanding the reception section. The second, third, and fourth paragraphs include only two reviews each. There are twenty-three on Rotten Tomatoes. The issue is that there is an overabundance of quotes instead of more reviews. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed