Talk:Brander–Spencer model
 | Brander–Spencer model has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 19, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Brander–Spencer economic model, it is possible for a national government to increase a country's welfare through export subsidies but the policy is of the beggar thy neighbor type? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Brander–Spencer model/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- Well-written
- Lead section
- In lead sentence of last paragraph, "so called" is WP:WEASEL. Remove.
- Policy applications and applied work section - Agriculture subsection.
- Change She to Thursby at the start of the second sentence.
- Influence section.
- Italicize Journal of International Economics.
- Factually accurate and veriable.
- Use WP:CITET for all sources in the Works cited section.
- For the Krugman 1995 book, the link to this book is not valid. Please fix.
- Broad in coverage.
- Covers importance in an economic system, and is able to be understood on this.
- Neutral.
- No issues.
- Stable.
- No issues. Last edit done prior to review was on June 2, 2010.
- Illustrated.
- Both images valid. No issues.
- Overall.
- Hold. Couple of minor edits and finding the valid sourcing, and you have a GA.
Reviewer: Chris (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Implemented the suggestions in the "Well-written" section. The link to the Krugman book works for me, though the first page it opens up with is one of the ones unavailable in Google books. Pg. 236, which is one cited in the article, however, is available. Let me look over WP:CITET to get that part done.radek (talk) 15:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- ok, I used the citation templates in the Works cited section.radek (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Should we subject this article to peer review?Lbertolotti (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brander–Spencer model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927164138/http://www.cepr.org/pubs/bulletin/meets/246.htm to http://www.cepr.org/pubs/bulletin/meets/246.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)