Talk:Boxing Australia

Latest comment: 2 months ago by BlueBellTree in topic Prominent Boxers

"High Performance"

edit

The inclusion of "High Performance" programs really doesn't add anything to the objective functioning of the organisation as a functioning regulatory body. It appears that the inclusion of "High Performance" along with more inclusion of how the body is supporting talented boxers does necessarily read as more of promotive language. I might come back to it later because I am not sure if that should be removed. I think that that portion of the article should be reworked or removed. The High Performance description just seems to serve to bolster the appeal of the organisation, rather than being an objective recital of what it actually is; which is apt for wikipedia. B1332 (talk) 10:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree with B1332, and remove the sentence. BlueBellTree (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Prominent Boxers

edit

It would be good to have a paragraph talking about some of the prominent boxers who have been part of the organisation BlueBellTree (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply