Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina–Croatia relations

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

CSD

edit

IMO, relations of two mid-sized countries, who each share the largest part of their border with the other, are inherently notable. —Admiral Norton (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not really... They already have their own articles, this is just a content fork, and I rather doubt the two country's diplomatic relations are particularly significant. --Pstanton (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I live in Croatia and from my experience in reading newspapers I can confirm that this will become more than just a content copy. I will be able to prove it at least on Tuesday (I won't have much time before that). —Admiral Norton (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, this is a highly notable relationship. Of course there's been a rash of AfDs for Country A - Country B relations lately, but this is nothing like that. These two countries have significant issues and lots of history. Cool3 (talk) 23:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Correct Name

edit

According to the naming guidelines of WP:WPFR, articles on relations between countries should the adjective forms in the name. So, I suppose that would technically make this Croatian-Bosnian and Herzegovinan relations, but that's one heck of a mouthful. What about Bosnian-Croatian relations instead? Or should we just ignore all rules and leave it at the present name? Cool3 (talk) 23:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid that IAR is the "least evil" here. We might elect to use just "Bosnian", but, as I said on WT:WPFR, it is used to refer either to the Bosnian language (as in Differences between standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian), inhabitants of Bosnia proper (as in Bosnian Serbs or, less frequently, to Bosna River. —Admiral Norton (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I think you're right. I've often sees "Bosnian" used in the context "Bosnian government", but that would tend to refer to the Federation and exclude the Republika Srpska. Cool3 (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

Someone should make a new infobox map. Bosnia and Herzegovina needs to be on the left side as per alphabetical order. --Wustenfuchs 14:24, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosnia and Herzegovina–Croatia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bosnia and Herzegovina–Croatia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply