Talk:Born This Way (song)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rp0211 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


OVERALL REVIEW

After reviewing this article thoroughly, I have decided to put this article on hold at this time. There are many grammar and spelling mistakes that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I believe these mistakes can be fixed within the general seven days allowed, so that is why I put it on hold. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   - I put it on "no" because of the many spelling and grammar mistakes below.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


Lead
  • No issues
Background
  • "White Shadow, one of the producers of the track, credited Gaga with coming up the idea..." - Put "with" between "up" and "the"
  • " Harkening back to the early '90s, when Madonna..." - Fix spacing at beginning of quote
  • "...your birth is infinite. - Add quote at end
Artwork and release
  • No issues
Composition
  • No issues
Remixes
  • "...they designed teh remix." - Fix spelling
Critical reception
  • No issues
Chart performance
  • "...as well as becoming Gaga's third number one singl." - Fix spelling
  • "with 4,602 plays after three days of availability, the highest detections total by a debuting song in the chart's history." - Needs reference
  • "...which debuted at number nine with 70 million audience." - Fix wording
Music video
  • No issues
Live performances
  • "At the February 19, 2011, date of The Monster Ball Tour..." - Fix wording
Other performances
  • No issues
Track listing and formats
  • No issues
Credits and personnel
  • No issues
Charts and certifications
Radio adds and release history
  • No issues
See also
  • No issues
References
  • No issues
Fixed Background section errors and 'teh remix'. WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN (♫♫) 01:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Wikipedia Penguin for fixing the other errors, and thank you Rp for reviewing the article. As for {{singlechart}}, here is my point. {{Singlechart}} is especially useful for articles which are not organized, devoid of sources, have low visibility among the users and prone to carelessness. Not the case with the Lady Gaga articles, where every article is pruned and honed to perfection, including the charts, the body, the references etc. Hence the organization is also done better here, and does not need singlechart template to validate it. Also, it was decided through an extensive (even exhaustive) discussion in my talk page that the template is really not mandatory and is decided by the above scenarios I mentioned. Please check if there are more issues that you can see. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident putting this article in good article status. Congratulations and keep up the good work. - Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply