Talk:Boom (2003 film)

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

On 10 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Boom (film) to Boom (2003 film). The result of the discussion was moved.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I heard this is pretty much a fancy soft-core porn move. So my question is was anal attempted in this movie? I'm looking for soft-core depictions of anal sex for a womens studies research project. Of course I have plenty of hard-core porn examples but you'd be surprised how little anal sex there is in soft-core porn. 69.244.117.28 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC).Reply

Requested move 10 July 2024

Latest comment: 5 months ago6 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Similar to the nominator, the use of marks, etc. does not fully distinguish between both titles. It received supports, which tackled the two oppose (one of which supports the first proposal), a point already addressed by the supporters. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Boom (film) → Boom (2003 film)
Boom! (film) → Boom! (1968 film)

– The presence or absence of an exclamation point is not sufficient disambiguation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose – I'm pretty sure WP:DIFFPUNCT applies here (let alone the 2003 film having a ~176:1 pageview ratio with the 1968 film). JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 15:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose 2nd, unless the 2003 one also uses an exclamation mark the presence of it probably distinguishes. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support per nomination. Where film titles are concerned, WP:SMALLDIFFERENCES such as commas, ellipses, exclamation points or question marks are insufficient to disambiguate from titles with different marks or an absence of marks. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. Yes, because we all know which has which punctuation! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic