This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Booking Holdings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rentalcars.com was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 December 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Booking Holdings. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editHow to best communicate that rental car services at smaller airports may just decide not to honor the vouchers bought from the priceline group's rentalcars.com site, and rentalcars.com may still insist you to pay for the said voucher? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:105F:11:F5B4:8FE2:1407:33E5 (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi! If you provide a reliable secondary source, we can look at adding that in, if it is more than a one-off instance. Daylen (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Criticism
editThe criticism section shall be maintained unless anyone has a disagreement with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.168.76.1 (talk) 10:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I've reverted your last change to the article which had reverted the latest financial updates to the page. Also, if you notice you're just adding text from a copy-paste that's missing the citations (they just show as [35][36][37].." without markup). The 'See also' is not linked either. Ptrnext (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Added the see also link back alone - the rest is probably undue given the current length of the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)