Talk:Bo Randall

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Bo Randall. Jenks24 (talk) 09:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Walter Doane "Bo" Randall, Jr. → Walter Doane Randall, Jr. – or Bo Randall, not a hybrid. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Support per WP:NICKNAME: "Bill Clinton, not William "Bill" Clinton." It probably should move to Bo Randall, since that's what's in the headline of the Sun Sentinel obituary. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Move to Bo Randall. Should be concise. George Ho (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Support, move to Bo Per above. --JustBerry (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Comment: CSD G6'ed Bo Randall, linking warrant back to this discussion, in preparation for page move. --JustBerry (talk) 02:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Best to wait for administrative action. --George Ho (talk) 02:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agree @George Ho: Sure. --JustBerry (talk) 03:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't know whether you mean letting things flow properly. You would notice that I reverted your proposal to prevent improper move. --George Ho (talk) 03:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic