Talk:Blizna V-2 missile launch site
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blizna V-2 missile launch site article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | A fact from Blizna V-2 missile launch site appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | Text and/or other creative content from Blizna was copied or moved into V-2 missile launch site, Blizna. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
CE
editDid quick ce while review pending, rv as desired, regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- As a quick comment, there seems to be some over referencing as quite a few basic facts receive multiple references for no clear reason (eg, "An SS military base near Blizna was set up on 5 November 1943, from which 139 A4 (also known as V-2) rockets were launched for experimental purposes and for training.[3][11][5][6]", "worked at the Blizna test site and personally visited the test missile impact areas to troubleshoot any problems discovered during trials.[3][11][20][6][7][8][16]", etc). This makes the article look a bit dubious. Also, what makes "RussianSpaceWeb.Com" and "Polish Greatness.com" reliable sources that need to be used here? Some of the other references also seem to be enthusiast websites and the like. Nick-D (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nick-D I added all the available references when putting the article together in the knowledge that we would loose a few. They all tell slightly different stories, so will be useful in the expansion of the article. Many refs are in Polish. As it is a new article I don't think the large amount of refs is doing it any harm.
- Best regards -- Marek.69 talk 16:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Keith-264
-- Marek.69 talk 16:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on V-2 missile launch site, Blizna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://alemuzea.pl/park-historyczny-blizna/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140417033243/http://www.v2rakete.de/blizna/index.html to http://www.v2rakete.de/blizna/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)