Talk:Black Widows of Liverpool
Black Widows of Liverpool has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed move at Black Widow
editFor any editors concerned, there is a proposed moved at the disambiguation page Black Widow. If you have anything to add to the discussion, please do. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Black_Widow#Proposed_move Weebro55 (talk) 04:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Was it a public execution?
editThe article states: "The deaths were witnessed by a reported one thousand people" and yet I believe the last public execution in England was in 1867. Did prison execution chambers really accommodate so many witnesses? 81.157.243.141 (talk) 00:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black Widows of Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124221713/http://www.liv.ac.uk/precinct/Oct2002/6.html to http://www.liv.ac.uk/precinct/Oct2002/6.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)