Talk:Black Light Burns
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removal of Danny Lonher from guest contributors
editI removed him since he was a member of the group when the songs he supposedly guest starred on were recorded. Bane II (talk) 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Genre
editAlternative Metal seems a fair label, especially with tracks like "Mesopotamia", and a clear dark synthesizer dose makes for a good case to lable them Industrial Rock. However, even though the most clear comparison would be Nine Inch Nails, and NIN stradles the line between Industrial Rock and Industrial Metal, BLB is, IMO, more clearly labeled as Industrial Rock. Heavy rock yes, industrial influenced yes, but not the combination of metal and industrial that designates other bands as Industrial Metal as opposed to Industrial Rock. -Haphazardjoy (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Genres
editThere was like 10 genres listed under there about three weeks ago. They're industrial metal, progressive metal, industrial rock, alternative metal, progressive rock, heavy metal, and Hard rock. If you could re-list the whole group of genres that were there before, I and many others would appreciate it. -Arcai, 9-6-2008, 12:02 PM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.21.39 (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Erasure?
editWho deleted all the info and limited to such a small amount of description? I felt that the wiki entry was fine the way it was before, especially considering the small amount of info there is available for the band. Why has all points pertaining to the next album also been erased? They were cited, and the point that songs have been made for the upcoming Underworld was very prominent and confirmed to be actual news and not hopeful blathering? 98.202.175.139 (talk) 20:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Boxset / Soundtrack
edit-Removed boxset entry "Order of the Black Light", can find nothing on the internet to state this was ever released or planned to be released. Could have been a working title for their Covers deluxe album.
-Added their Soundtrack entry on Underworld The Awakening, from 2012. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.108.242.223 (talk) 03:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Black Light Burns
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Black Light Burns's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "RIAA":
- From List of music recording certifications: "RIAA – Recording Industry Association of America". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved 2008-05-26.
- From Limp Bizkit discography: "American certifications – Limp Bizkit". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved September 25, 2012.
- From Fiona Apple: "Gold and Platinum Searchable Database"[dead link ]. RIAA.com.
- From Music download: "For Students Doing Reports". RIAA. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Black Light Burns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221022832/http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=36794676&blogID=456675112 to http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=36794676&blogID=456675112
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110818140802/http://www.theofficialcharts.com/artist/_/limp%20bizkit to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/artist/_/Limp%20Bizkit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)