Talk:Biology of depression
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Huhiop in topic A part should be re-writed
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biology of depression article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 21 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Third ventricle hypothesis of depression page were merged into Biology of depression on September 25, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Genetic factors: Neanderthal gene
editSee: Our Neanderthal genes linked to risk of depression and addiction. Puduḫepa (talk) 05:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
A part should be re-writed
editin Difficulty of gene studies, i think that this part should be re-writed as I dont understand it at all: However, as the number of genes reduces the likelihood of choosing a correct candidate gene, Type I errors (false positives) are highly likely. Huhiop (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)