Talk:Biofact (archaeology)

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Biofact (archaeology) is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.

Section "Notable historical examples"

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The examples of ecofacts given all predate humans. Do they meet the "culturally relevant" criterion stated earlier in the article? 108.18.207.147 (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any references to archaeologists finding these ecofacts (versus paleontologists) in the sources, either. As the user who put this segment in hasn't edited in a while, I think it's best just to delete this for now rather than ask what's up. TangoFett (talk) 23:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic