Talk:Bialik College

Standards

As a current VCE student of Bialik, I question the person who has decided to write this article. Is it to be a stub that is merely used as a reference for other pages, or do you actually intend on doing the research and making this a proper page? I do not consider the mention of a financial endowment much of a reference, and know there are other things that could be added. There are a number of staff members who are quite prominent in the field of education, not to mention our principal, Genia Janover, who is recognized as one of the most experienced and devoted people in her field. I would recommend that if we do not intend on writing an article - there is an abundance of material to use if this is decided - it should be deleted. Evolver of Borg 10:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Evolver of Borg, I only found this article because I was covering the biographies of Georgiou and Frydenberg. I'm not at all familliar with the school, and Xtra has marked it for cleanup. Would you be interested in rewriting the page with a fuller history? It would need some referencing in any case I suspect. Please don't sacrifice your VCE just to have an A+++ page for your school. I'd be especially interested in its beginnings; and its relationships with other Jewish school around the country. Care to help? --schgooda 14:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

My mistake, I looked at the message before viewing the actual article...Good start guys.--schgooda 14:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I do have some interest in writing an article, but it would probably be in about 7 months time, after I've finished my exams. There is quite a bit of material I have access to which could make the page quite rich, but as I said, time is a factor. I'll take a few photos in the next couple of weeks, which should be useful for any future expansion of the article. Evolver of Borg 07:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm happy to adopt this. I'm a former student, still involved in the wider Bialik 'family', so I'll clean this up and add some info. --Liam 03:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I just gave the page a good clean up. Feel free to revert my edits if you feel it was unwanted, unnecessary, etc. I reckon the TotallyDisputed box can now be removed. Anyone agree/disagree? --Liam 05:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning

User Bialikcollege and others, likely the same person under different names, have been removing most of the content of this page. Please look to older revisions if this continues to happen. ~~ Meeples 07:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Bialikcollege (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been temporarily blocked, but it appears the vandalism has not ended. If it continues from one IP, that can be blocked as well, but if it continues from multiple IPs the page should probably be semiprotected. If the vandalism continues either way, please put a note up at WP:AN/I and/or contact me at my talk page. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Correct information

I ask that anyone making changes to this page to use correct up-todate info.

Thanks kindly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bialikcollege (talk • contribs) 5 August 2006

"Bialik was endowed with a large state government grant" information incorrect and content removed from article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.94.29 (talk • contribs) 5 August 2006

I find refernces

...

Fair use rationale for Image:BialikCollege.png

Image:BialikCollege.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Motto/Refs 1, 2

I changed the motto to the English version because the cached about page for the college doesn't mention a proper spelling for the translation. I didn't look at the image until afterwards, but now I feel that I'm wrong. I'll leave it for somebody to correct, as I'm unsure which version is right.

I also noticed that refs 1 and 2 are dead, perhaps somebody can substitute a cached version? {_C  A S U K I T E  ^T} 14:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)