Talk:Bernard Whimpress

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Laterthanyouthink in topic Promo and too detailed
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bernard Whimpress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography

edit

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 08:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Promo and too detailed

edit

This article looks as if it has been created by person(s) related to the subject, and it is way too long, reads like a resume/promo, and has not nearly enough citations. With an eye to WP:BIO, WP:BLP, WP:SOAPBOX and WP:BIODD, if someone is willing to copyedit this article to standard, please do so, or I will be coming back with a machete and doing a slash-and-burn to cut this down by about 75%, and I am not going to be hunting down each of those publications to assess its notability, and I don't know which are more important than others. It is certainly not necessary to include every piece of published work for minor authors, and each statement in the article needs to be cited inline (at the end of the paragaph if appropriate). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply