Talk:Benson raft
![]() | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Benson raft page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Benson raft was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Oregon NA‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Pictures
editThis article should really only have one or two pictures, not every available picture of the raft. Since the photographs exist on Wikimedia Commons, please utilize the Commons template. The359 (Talk) 06:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Rubbish. What's the problem in having so many photos? It's not like we are short of space here. Each of the photos has something unique and informative to it. A gallery is fine.
- Every photograph ever is unique. That does not mean they are all necessary in a relatively short article. Some images are informative, but most are redundant or easily explained by text. This is an encyclopedia, not an image gallery. Please see Manual of Style - Images. The359 (Talk) 07:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- In this particular case, the unusual nature of the topic (the assembly of large numbers of logs into a single sea-going raft) probably justifies more photos than usual. The photo gallery does illustrate the process.Mtsmallwood (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Every photograph ever is unique. That does not mean they are all necessary in a relatively short article. Some images are informative, but most are redundant or easily explained by text. This is an encyclopedia, not an image gallery. Please see Manual of Style - Images. The359 (Talk) 07:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Propulsion
editI came here to ask for more inofrmation about how the rafts were propelled - towed by tug? 81.147.147.215 (talk) 06:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
In answer to the person asking about how the rafts were propelled, it seems from the photos that they were treated as a barge and pushed, rather than pulled. By so doing, the barge may be steered by the 'pusher' engines with a higher degree of control than can be applied by simply towing a non-steering mass. I hope this makes things more clear. You might have a look in the appropriate portal for more information about barges, especially those on the major rivers of the world, and those in the Gulf of Mexico. Best Regards, Drieux 07:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drieux (talk • contribs)
Some of the picture captions say:
- Sternwheeler pushing Benson raft ca 1906
- Benson sea-going log raft being pushed down Columbia River
- Steamers "Shaver" and "Henderson" pushing log raft
- I think they were mostly pushed.--Doug Coldwell talk 20:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Till...
editAre these rafts still being launched? When was the last one launched? This article leaves me curious as to the success and fate of the project72.201.219.8 (talk) 11:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- The article does answer the question with: The operation went on until 1941 with over 120 log rafts built...
- Additionally it says: There were only four of these sea-going log rafts lost, due to fire or storms. --Doug Coldwell talk 11:29, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- But, what the article does not really address is, why are Benson rafts no longer used, if they were so efficient?72.94.182.41 (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Economic reality altered. The roads back then were enough to cause almost anything that could be shipped via water to be so sent. Since the late 1930s, the roads from/to the Pacific Northwest have improved by orders of magnitude. Also in that same interval, the local timbering industry in SoCal has dropped the price on common lumber and tree products well below the point where only specialty products can compete. Best regards Drieux 17:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drieux (talk • contribs)
- But, what the article does not really address is, why are Benson rafts no longer used, if they were so efficient?72.94.182.41 (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Benson raft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425050837/http://www.readbookonline.net:80/readOnLine/22955/ to http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/22955/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101029020439/http://bensonhotel.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=miHaAhXjvek%3d&tabid=37 to http://www.bensonhotel.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=miHaAhXjvek%3D&tabid=37
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
editThis article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)