Talk:Battle of Velestino/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • External links OK, no DABs
  • Most images need a PD-US tag including the CC0 images
    • Done.
  • Link Thessaly
    • Where? It is already linked in the lede, infobox, and first occurrence in the body.
  • were mobilized again I don't think that mobilized is the right word here
    • Fixed.
  • engineers or engineer? It's usually the later in English when used as an adjective.
    • Fixed.
  • Are Evzone battalions really notable?
    • They were independent formations, established in the 1860s and not integrated into regiments until 1913, so I'd say they warrant an article, or at least a link that will point to some overarching article (lots of work remains to be done at Evzones)...
  • close order formation hyphen between close order
    • Done.
  • danger of being cut off by the Rizomylos stream Not sure what you mean here
    • Clarified, hopefully.
  • quiet on that day delete "on"
    • Done.
  • Down to 29 April, more late.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • What's a sappers-firemen company?
    • Clarified, hopefully.
  • The rest looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi Sturmvogel 66, any further comments/suggestions? Cheers, Constantine 14:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
No, not that I can think of.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply