Talk:Battle of Tinzaouaten (2024)

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Chomik1129 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit

  • Reviewed:
Created by Chomik1129 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Chomik! (talk?) 17:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC).Reply

If the toll is not confirmed best not to use it as a hook. Ukraine's involvement does sound more interesting.VR (Please ping on reply) 16:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Vice regent: added an alt hook about Ukraine. Chomik! (talk?) 17:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
It looks good as it is. I would prefer "that Ukraine said it provided Tuareg rebels with assistance in their successful ambush of Wagner Group mercenaries in Mali?" As I said on talk this was more of an ambush. But I think your alt is fine too.VR (Please ping on reply) 22:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Will take, probably tomorrow. For now, striking ALT0.--Launchballer 14:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  @Chomik1129: Long enough, new enough. No copyright concerns, no maintenance templates deserved, no QPQ needed. The hook does not meet WP:DYKINT - please propose a hook that is unusual or intriguing to a broad audience.--Launchballer 07:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Chomik1129: Please address the above.--Launchballer 09:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Launchballer: I created a hook that I think is easier to understand. What are your thoughts? Chomik! (talk?) 10:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comprehensibility isn't the problem, although that is a better hook in that respect. A country providing support during a battle is not unusual.--Launchballer 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Launchballer: I see. I added another hook, do you think it's okay? Chomik! (talk?) 12:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

I propose a merger Tinzaouaten ambush into Battle of Tinzaouaten (2024), I created that article not knowing this article exists and thus it is a duplicate article.Garmin21 (talk) 06:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree. As you created the article and the only other contributor has made just a few copy edits, I think you should boldly go ahead and merge. Nurg (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agree to merging. I also think "ambush" is a more WP:COMMONNAME than "battle"[4][5].VR (Please ping on reply) 13:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. Bold merge works in this scenario as it's an unintended extra. Jebiguess (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to go ahead and merge if not one has any objections--Garmin21 (talk) 06:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply