Talk:Battle of Hazir

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Help

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article needs it. Such obvious bias in the writing, really below Wikipedia standards. From the article: "But they were up against the finest body of men of the time." Come on. Just one of many prejudicial sentences. Cutugno (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think it's not bias, but simply Khalid's Army assessment prestigious considering their already impressive record beating much more advanced military empires such as Byzantine and Sassanids. for the detail maybe its mentioning his personal Elite "mobile guard" Ahendra (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.136.149.11 (talk) Reply

The strength of the two opponents are not supported by any reference. As in many articles involving Byzantine battles, Byzantine army strength is exaggerate. I suggest to changes numbers to 'unknown' Oberoon (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good Article

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The other related battle articles should be like this. Misdemenor (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Hazir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041210000537/http://www.swordofallah.com/html/bookhome.htm to http://www.swordofallah.com/html/bookhome.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic