Talk:Battle of Benfleet

Military history: British / European / Nordic / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

East Anglia: Essex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Essex task force.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

A fact from Battle of Benfleet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that evidence of the battle of Benfleet was found in the 19th century in the form of charred timbers and human bones?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Benfleet.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the battle of Benfleet was one of the most complete victories gained over the Vikings on English soil up to that point? Source: It was, in short, one of the most most complete victories hitherto gained over a viking force on English soil.
- ALT1: ... that evidence of the battle of Benfleet was found in the 19th century in the form of charred timbers and human bones? Source: Human bones and charred timbers preserved in the mud made a vivid reminder of the siege of Benfleet
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mass card

Converted from a redirect by CSJJ104 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

I would say the ALT hook is better as the casual reader won't know when the battle took place or how significant the statement is. Either is worthy of DYK though. Echetus Xe 15:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic