Talk:Battle of Andros (1696)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

disambiguating Vatican - question

edit

Does the first sentence of this article mean that Contarini was fighting with Vatican (Papal States) forces against Turkey, or that Contarini was sharing authority over his forces with the Vatican (Holy See)?. If anyone knows, please correct the link for me!! ~ VELEDAN TALKCTRB' 16:37, 13 August 2005 (UTC) disambiguation link repair (You can help!)Reply

I assume that they were separate forces, but that Contarini had overall control. There would've been 1 overall commander. I could check if you want, or if you have access to the source book... -SpookyMulder 13:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Andros (1696). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply